<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Public Safety Signals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com</link>
	<description>A discussion of Public Safety issues and why they matter</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Line of Duty Death by Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/10/02/line-of-duty-death/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=118#comment-977</guid>
		<description>Jerry, like yourself, in my 32 years, I have seen far too many of our PS heroes fall. If safety planning, or even our discussions here, can save just one life we have served a great good for our fellow public safety member, that family, that community and for the nation.

Thanks for the comment.
Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, like yourself, in my 32 years, I have seen far too many of our PS heroes fall. If safety planning, or even our discussions here, can save just one life we have served a great good for our fellow public safety member, that family, that community and for the nation.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.<br />
Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Line of Duty Death by Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/10/02/line-of-duty-death/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=118#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Kevin, thanks for your comment. Correctional officers are absolutely a critical part of the public safety team! I know that we, here at Capella, have built our public safety program with that recognition and designed the Leadership specialization to be applicable for those in that field as well. I salute correctional officers for their work!
Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, thanks for your comment. Correctional officers are absolutely a critical part of the public safety team! I know that we, here at Capella, have built our public safety program with that recognition and designed the Leadership specialization to be applicable for those in that field as well. I salute correctional officers for their work!<br />
Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Line of Duty Death by KSmith35</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/10/02/line-of-duty-death/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>KSmith35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=118#comment-966</guid>
		<description>There is one segment of law enforcement that many omit or do not include in 'law enforcement' are the correctional officers.  Many refer to these professionals as 'guards'; these people are more than guards, they are also front line counselors, front line medics and also the enforcers.  Just because these people are not out in the public eye, many are not considered law enforcement.  These officers are POST certified and have limited arrest powers.

There have several killed in the line of duty but are seldom recognized for their efforts and dedication to protecting the public. I have worked for over 17 years in the prison system in the state of Georgia and have known a few officers that have been killed or seriously injured.  THey only recognition that was given to them was in-house.

Thanks.
Kevin Smith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one segment of law enforcement that many omit or do not include in &#8216;law enforcement&#8217; are the correctional officers.  Many refer to these professionals as &#8216;guards&#8217;; these people are more than guards, they are also front line counselors, front line medics and also the enforcers.  Just because these people are not out in the public eye, many are not considered law enforcement.  These officers are POST certified and have limited arrest powers.</p>
<p>There have several killed in the line of duty but are seldom recognized for their efforts and dedication to protecting the public. I have worked for over 17 years in the prison system in the state of Georgia and have known a few officers that have been killed or seriously injured.  THey only recognition that was given to them was in-house.</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
Kevin Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Higher Education - Graduate Savvy by Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/11/06/online-higher-education-graduate-savvy/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=124#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Hello, correction on my last comment. Dr. Green will offer two webinars and not three. Please join us in the discussion of online education.
Thanks
Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, correction on my last comment. Dr. Green will offer two webinars and not three. Please join us in the discussion of online education.<br />
Thanks<br />
Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy affects public safety by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/11/03/economy-affects-public-safety/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=122#comment-964</guid>
		<description>This is Mark again. As a follow-up, I found a story today that just emphasised what I wrote in the blog. It appears as if New York City is making extreme measures to cut spending, a large sum in the public safety and public health arena. See http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&#38;id=61527</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Mark again. As a follow-up, I found a story today that just emphasised what I wrote in the blog. It appears as if New York City is making extreme measures to cut spending, a large sum in the public safety and public health arena. See <a href="http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&amp;id=61527" rel="nofollow">http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&amp;id=61527</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Line of Duty Death by JSMITH41</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/10/02/line-of-duty-death/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>JSMITH41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=118#comment-963</guid>
		<description>I have spent 30 years in LE and was a member of the Honor Guard and whenever we had to perform for anyfallen PS person, it hurt. I wondered, if that life could have been saved and I realized that , in order to make a difference, I must follow a safety plan and be a symbol for someone else to follow.
thanks for your awareness and concern for others.
Jerry Smith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent 30 years in LE and was a member of the Honor Guard and whenever we had to perform for anyfallen PS person, it hurt. I wondered, if that life could have been saved and I realized that , in order to make a difference, I must follow a safety plan and be a symbol for someone else to follow.<br />
thanks for your awareness and concern for others.<br />
Jerry Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Line of Duty Death by Jack Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/10/02/line-of-duty-death/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=118#comment-961</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your post Mark and agree wholeheartedly.  You are probably preaching to the choir, but we need to become the best choir and get more to join the choir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your post Mark and agree wholeheartedly.  You are probably preaching to the choir, but we need to become the best choir and get more to join the choir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Houston: Hurricane Ike by Mark Warnick</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/09/19/from-houston-hurricane-ike/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Warnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=113#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Thanks for the clarification, and I see we are on the same page afterall. Good luck with everything down there. Take Care and Stay Safe, ... Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Thanks for the clarification, and I see we are on the same page afterall. Good luck with everything down there. Take Care and Stay Safe, &#8230; Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Houston: Hurricane Ike by Mark R.</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/09/19/from-houston-hurricane-ike/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=113#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I understand your comments, and appreciate them. I work with FEMA (USAR) in post-disaster situations. My point of my post may have been lost in the verbage. When the state drops the ball, who shoudl take the ball? FEMA, with its ability to pull in resources from the federal level, seems to be the obvious choice. We are not taking about police duties, or anything similar; in NIMS terms, assume the role of incident commander. 

With Ike, 90 counties were attempting to "self-manage" relief efforts with FEMA's help. THe issues srose when larger counties, with their political clout, received priority consideration from the state, leaving smaller but more devistated counties without relief. Because the local and state governments were busy with self-interest motives, FEMA appeared to be ineffective. The fault did not rest with FEMA, but the agency had to take the heat. 

In terms of a violation of Posse Commitatus, the application of the PCA is very limited in scope (and routinely violated to an extent that makes it virtually ineffective to begin with). The navy routinely circumvents the terms of the PCA by housing Coast Guard personnel on their vessels in order to board US vessels in search of drugs. While the Coast Guard has adequate facilites to perform its duty, a destroyer is far more intimidating than a cutter. Similarly, the National Guard is routinely deployed in localities. While 200 years ago there was a true distinction between the US Army and State National Guards, that line is now so blurred that it is truely irrelevant.

Fianlly, I only qustion the elimination of FEMA to prove the point you made; there is no real alternative, however in its present state people already in highly stressful situations are forced to deal with a bureaucracy so disjoint endure a compouding level of stress (I am one of them...).

In the end, we, as a country, need to make some hard decisions as to how we are going to move forward in terms of disaster response. We need to remove the politics from the equation and streamline the processes.

Have a great day.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I understand your comments, and appreciate them. I work with FEMA (USAR) in post-disaster situations. My point of my post may have been lost in the verbage. When the state drops the ball, who shoudl take the ball? FEMA, with its ability to pull in resources from the federal level, seems to be the obvious choice. We are not taking about police duties, or anything similar; in NIMS terms, assume the role of incident commander. </p>
<p>With Ike, 90 counties were attempting to &#8220;self-manage&#8221; relief efforts with FEMA&#8217;s help. THe issues srose when larger counties, with their political clout, received priority consideration from the state, leaving smaller but more devistated counties without relief. Because the local and state governments were busy with self-interest motives, FEMA appeared to be ineffective. The fault did not rest with FEMA, but the agency had to take the heat. </p>
<p>In terms of a violation of Posse Commitatus, the application of the PCA is very limited in scope (and routinely violated to an extent that makes it virtually ineffective to begin with). The navy routinely circumvents the terms of the PCA by housing Coast Guard personnel on their vessels in order to board US vessels in search of drugs. While the Coast Guard has adequate facilites to perform its duty, a destroyer is far more intimidating than a cutter. Similarly, the National Guard is routinely deployed in localities. While 200 years ago there was a true distinction between the US Army and State National Guards, that line is now so blurred that it is truely irrelevant.</p>
<p>Fianlly, I only qustion the elimination of FEMA to prove the point you made; there is no real alternative, however in its present state people already in highly stressful situations are forced to deal with a bureaucracy so disjoint endure a compouding level of stress (I am one of them&#8230;).</p>
<p>In the end, we, as a country, need to make some hard decisions as to how we are going to move forward in terms of disaster response. We need to remove the politics from the equation and streamline the processes.</p>
<p>Have a great day.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Houston: Hurricane Ike by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/2008/09/19/from-houston-hurricane-ike/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsafetysignals.com/?p=113#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Mark,
     I think you have misunderstanding of what FEMA's responsibility is in a disaster. You say;
 
"Why is it that FEMA , with many hurricane’s under its belt, can not seem to pull a disaster plan together quickly? Is politics to blame, and should FEMA become an independent agency without direct political ties to the White House and Congress? Should block grants be given to states for disaster relief and eliminate FEMA entirely? As the days, weeks, and months progress, the answer to these questions must be addressed."
 
     First, FEMA is there to support state governments, and they can only provide what the state requests. According to the law, they can only be requested when local and state resources are not enough to respond to the situation and the Governor of the state declares a disaster and asks for assistance from the President. The problem, more often than not, is at the state level. 
     Many people do not realize that FEMA is only a support organization. According to some legal minds, if they overstep their bounds, even though they aren't part of the military, it could be considered a violation of the "Posse Comitatus Act" in regards to policing because they are part of the government. I see you have been in Law Enforcement a while, let me ask you this;
     If there was a disaster in your area, and FEMA came in and took over command and began giving the local and state government orders, do you think it would go over well? Would you be happy to take orders from a FEMA person telling you what to do in your town? Of course not! That would go over as well as a fart in church!
     It is also a very slippery slope if the fed takes over operationally as it is also illegal. They cannot do anything without a state request. FEMA representatives are told at all levels that they cannot and will not supersede local or state authorities. They are there to coordinate the response when the local and state is overwhelmed. The only time that FEMA does not need to be requested is when the disaster occurs on federal property or from federal assets such as the Space Shuttle Columbia crash.
     Politically speaking, once the Federal Disaster Declaration is declared, not Congress, Senate, nor the President has any say about funding and very little to say about the response (except when it is flubbed). That funding is guaranteed under the Stafford Act and is protected. FEMA is supposed to organize and work with around thirty government offices and twenty or so non-profits to coordinate those entities as requested by the state. 
     The question of the block grants and getting rid of FEMA is actually one of the least thought through and foolish ideas I have ever heard. FEMA is the only constant resource in a disaster that holds things together. If we go to a piecemeal approach where every state does its own thing, you will see more suffering and less forward movement during a disaster. In my opinion it will be just as bad as it was in past when federal resources were piecemeal from the 1930’s to the 1960’s. I encourage you to research those days when disaster assistance was provided under the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
     If I read your post correctly, you blamed FEMA for not having power turned on. They have no responsibility for repairing transmission lines at all; this is part of an interstate compact between electric companies.
     Please don’t take this post as a challenge, because it is not meant to be. This post is to begin to help people to clear up a misunderstanding that is usually spread by the media. I have taken over 50 FEMA courses from the Emergency Management Institute, and I have been in Emergency Management in some form since 1990. I learned most of this from studying with FEMA. I suggest anyone that disagrees to research this subject, and if I am wrong, I will be the first to admit it. Thanks for you time, …Mark


Take care and stay safe,
Mark S. Warnick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
     I think you have misunderstanding of what FEMA&#8217;s responsibility is in a disaster. You say;</p>
<p>&#8220;Why is it that FEMA , with many hurricane’s under its belt, can not seem to pull a disaster plan together quickly? Is politics to blame, and should FEMA become an independent agency without direct political ties to the White House and Congress? Should block grants be given to states for disaster relief and eliminate FEMA entirely? As the days, weeks, and months progress, the answer to these questions must be addressed.&#8221;</p>
<p>     First, FEMA is there to support state governments, and they can only provide what the state requests. According to the law, they can only be requested when local and state resources are not enough to respond to the situation and the Governor of the state declares a disaster and asks for assistance from the President. The problem, more often than not, is at the state level.<br />
     Many people do not realize that FEMA is only a support organization. According to some legal minds, if they overstep their bounds, even though they aren&#8217;t part of the military, it could be considered a violation of the &#8220;Posse Comitatus Act&#8221; in regards to policing because they are part of the government. I see you have been in Law Enforcement a while, let me ask you this;<br />
     If there was a disaster in your area, and FEMA came in and took over command and began giving the local and state government orders, do you think it would go over well? Would you be happy to take orders from a FEMA person telling you what to do in your town? Of course not! That would go over as well as a fart in church!<br />
     It is also a very slippery slope if the fed takes over operationally as it is also illegal. They cannot do anything without a state request. FEMA representatives are told at all levels that they cannot and will not supersede local or state authorities. They are there to coordinate the response when the local and state is overwhelmed. The only time that FEMA does not need to be requested is when the disaster occurs on federal property or from federal assets such as the Space Shuttle Columbia crash.<br />
     Politically speaking, once the Federal Disaster Declaration is declared, not Congress, Senate, nor the President has any say about funding and very little to say about the response (except when it is flubbed). That funding is guaranteed under the Stafford Act and is protected. FEMA is supposed to organize and work with around thirty government offices and twenty or so non-profits to coordinate those entities as requested by the state.<br />
     The question of the block grants and getting rid of FEMA is actually one of the least thought through and foolish ideas I have ever heard. FEMA is the only constant resource in a disaster that holds things together. If we go to a piecemeal approach where every state does its own thing, you will see more suffering and less forward movement during a disaster. In my opinion it will be just as bad as it was in past when federal resources were piecemeal from the 1930’s to the 1960’s. I encourage you to research those days when disaster assistance was provided under the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.<br />
     If I read your post correctly, you blamed FEMA for not having power turned on. They have no responsibility for repairing transmission lines at all; this is part of an interstate compact between electric companies.<br />
     Please don’t take this post as a challenge, because it is not meant to be. This post is to begin to help people to clear up a misunderstanding that is usually spread by the media. I have taken over 50 FEMA courses from the Emergency Management Institute, and I have been in Emergency Management in some form since 1990. I learned most of this from studying with FEMA. I suggest anyone that disagrees to research this subject, and if I am wrong, I will be the first to admit it. Thanks for you time, …Mark</p>
<p>Take care and stay safe,<br />
Mark S. Warnick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
